|
Fiction Writers, why work with a freelance editor for your novel? It depends on what your needs are. The decision to hire an editor is a very personal one. In this article, we’ll look at the following considerations:
- What level of writing should I be at in order to get the most out of professional editing services?
- The Benefits and Drawbacks to a Critique Group
- What a freelance editor can do for a published novelist or pre-published fiction writer (and what they can’t)
- Why a freelancer editor may NOT be right for you
It seems that I run into two main mindsets when it comes to discussions about editing. Some people are so desperate to be published that they run around from conference to conference, are active in about sixteen different critique groups, and forty different online writers discussion groups. They have an entire library full of writing books, and they agonize at least twenty times a day about the contradicting advice given. If someone they considered important were to suggest a freelance editor to them, they wouldn’t sleep until they found an editor. They are Desperate.
Others respond to talk about getting an editor with a “ho-hum” roll of the eyes and a slight curl to their lip. “Editors,” they opine, “are a waste of time and money. If you really MUST get feedback on your work, join a critique group. At least there, the bad advice you get will be free.” They are Cynical.
Neither of these extremes is healthy. The Desperate-To-Be-Published Writer needs to take a chill pill and calm down and think things through. The Cynic might need to consider that we ALL need feedback on our work, and that sometimes a professional eye is just the extra push someone needs to reach their artistic goals.
If you are trying to make the decision about hiring a freelance fiction editor, here are some things you’ll need to consider:
Level of Writing
Frankly, if you are a beginning writer and still struggling with the craft of writing fiction, professional editing can be an overly expensive way to learn. The best time to look at a professional fiction editor for your novel is when you know the basics.
But if you have the money and would prefer to work with an editor on your beginning manuscript, I would highly recommend my friend, Camy Tang, who is also a published author and does manuscript and proposal critiques. Her service, The Story Sensei, caters to writers still learning the basics of the craft of fiction writing.
Beginning fiction writers may also want to consider the FFS Writing Coaching service. This will help you target craft areas to work on using a fun, conversational, low-pressure approach.
For example, do you understand the following:
- plot structure elements like pacing, conflicts, tension, climax, and resolution?
- Do you know how to identify which point of view you are writing from?
- Do you know the difference between a dialogue tag and a beat?
- In characterization, can you explain what a “goal,” “motivation,” or “conflict” is?
- Do you know what back story and flashbacks are?
If these are unfamiliar terms to you, then you need to get yourself some good books on how to write fiction, and you need to learn the craft of fiction writing. You don’t need an editor yet. There are some good resources about the craft of fiction writing in the Resource section.
If these concepts are still relatively new to you and you are still experimenting with how to use them, then you should probably hold off on getting an editor and instead work with a critique group or attend some writers’ workshops and conferences.
However, if you have completed a novel or two, or are well on your way toward completing one, and you are starting to feel like you’ve outgrown your critique group, or you’ve started getting some positive attention from editors and agents, then it might be time to consider bringing in a professional.
Critique Groups Vs. Professional Editing
Critique groups can be a valuable way to get practical experience not only in your own writing, but also in your editing skills and in how to graciously receive criticism and feedback on your work. I am a strong advocate for critique groups because I have benefited so much from them. In fact, I still belong to a critique group (of which I participate far less frequently than I’d wish). Without my critique group experiences, I would not be the writer or editor I am today. Critiquing other people’s work strengthens your own skills even more than receiving the feedback does. And critique groups can become valuable support groups as you go along your writing journey.
However, there are some drawbacks to critique groups.
- Time Commitment: There’s this little thing called Etiquette that demands that if your group critiques your work, you need to reciprocate with some critiquing of your own. It’s hard to keep up with it on a regular basis.
- Low Quality Feedback: The feedback you get may or may not be good advice. Ideally, critique groups would be comprised of both published and non-published writers, experienced authors and newbies, who all are interested in and knowledgeable about the genres of manuscripts being critiqued. If you happen to be a member of that sort of critique nirvana, I hope you know how very fortunate you are.
- Inexperienced Critiquers: Most critique groups are made up of newer writers or moderately experienced unpublished writers. (The reason is that once you get published, suddenly you have deadlines, marketing, and a whole host of other responsibilities that make it difficult to find time to brush your teeth, much less keep up with a critique group.) The lack of experience means that a lot of times your feedback will consist of little rules that the other group members have gleaned from their writers groups or books and applied over-zealously without really understanding the concept behind it. The problem with this is that no one in the group is able to develop a greater skill in their craft or even break into the realm of art because their writing is confined within these “rules” that they don’t really even understand. Sometimes, the feedback might be just plain wrong. Or you might get four critiques with four different viewpoints. It can be confusing and frustrating.
 |
-- continued
|